Doubts about the official 9/11 account? — these two videos will reinforce them

18 September 2019

Sociopaths and psychopaths in government?

You may have come across articles that highlight the anti-social nature of American government leaders. See one here, for instance.

If you are elderly, and have been paying attention, the legitimacy of those observations will not surprise you.

With regard to 9/11

The official American story blames the attack entirely on a couple of handfuls of poorly trained, technologically marginal Al-Qaeda operatives.

Evidence since, has made it clear that the government account is, almost certainly, not true.

First — for skeptics — a physics video

High school physics teacher David Chandler made a scientifically persuasive video that — visually and mathematically — disproves the official "airplanes and fire did it all" account.

Concepts of free fall and Newtonian counter-force are key to his reasoning:

By the Chandler video's end . . .

. . . if you understand Newtonian physics and your trust your eyes, you will probably be persuaded that World Trade Center towers 1,2 and 7 were collapsed by planned demolition.

You will also be convinced that the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) investigation that followed the attack was a coverup.

NIST failed to incorporate free fall evidence into its pancake reasoning, even after it had confirmed Chandler's hypothesis-negating evidence.

Getting rid of the crime scene evidence

The fact that the structural steel recovered from the World Trade Center site was reportedly shipped to China for destruction — before anyone could forensically examine it — should lend weight to the Falsification Hypothesis.

A key question — how could demolition devices have been placed in the World Trade Center buildings?

The key to this question appears to be the structurally related placement of elevators in each building.

Suspicious circumstances, which reportedly took place days before the attack, heighten the possibility that elevators and their shafts were used to place the hypothesized demolition charges:

Shoestring 9/11, Security Alerts, Disabled Fire Alarms, and Unused Elevators: Suspicious Events at the World Trade Center Before 9/11, Shoestring 9/11 (18 June 2018)

Having once been a youthful plumber's helper, pipe insulator and HVAC assistant — on a sprawling industrial scale property — I can attest to the fact that it is easy to prevent otherwise authorized people from gaining access to mechanical and structural components of very large buildings.

The flip side is that it is easy for the people, who are specifically authorized to enter these often out-of-the-way areas, to do so — and even hide there.

Second — for skeptics — a documentary about 9/11's numerous whistleblowers

The following video documents the efforts of (and facts offered by) people, who tried to tell the truth about September 11, 2001.

That these whistleblowers were intentionally sidelined says something:

Third — again for skeptics — a concisely written summary overview of the case against the official account

The following cited book includes faked telephone calls that were alleged to have come from the hijacked aircraft:

David Ray Griffin and Elizabeth Woodworth, 9/11 Unmasked: An International Review Panel Investigation (Olive Branch Press, 2018)

I mention the faked calls because they were crucial in misleading the public by substituting a falsified story line.

And the 9/11 Commission?

Its co-chairman Lee Hamilton said, "We thought we were set up to fail." See video interview here, at 2:00:25.

The moral? — The official account for 9/11 is, almost certainly, a lie

Contemplate what that means.

Full circle back to socio- and psychopaths in power.

PeteFree.com

Doubts about the official 9/11 account? — these two videos will reinforce them