Russian delusion, Chinese lecturing, and Iranian cluelessness — all on Syrian display

12 December 2024

The Zionist West's bad guys have won again

This time their purported adversaries' surprising ineptitude is now fully manifest. That may represent a cautionary tale.

Might it be helpful — at least to some people — to early-detect just who is too obtuse to survive a global conflict? One can then look to a stronger set of minds and arms for survival assistance.

For instance, BRICS

I suspect that Syria's (never-was-a-country) disintegration — with the Big Boy BRICS sitting on the sidelines — is likely to let some air out of the join-BRICS balloon:

If Russia (for example) can't even stop the West from lobbing missiles into the Federation's Motherland, how is Russia going to keep small BRICS nations from being eaten by the West's tigers?

In the same vein, what is Russia going to accomplish in its January talks with Iran, regarding creating a loose military alliance?

Most of the 'prestige ponies' have already run out through the burning barn door:

Putin has repeatedly demonstrated Russian passivity, while under what he calls 'existential' threat.

And similarly, Iran's suicidally vapid leadership has been too strategically clueless to have seized upon a nuclear weapons development program, so as to fend of the Zionist West's repeated attacks.

Meanwhile, China has been goody-two-shoeing, while the United States (oh-so-visibly) plots to off it.

For instance, regarding Syria's forced (not-a-country) disintegration at Turkish, American and Israeli hands — China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson (Mao Ning) said that:

The future of Syria should be decided by the Syrian people.

We hope relevant parties will find a political settlement to restore stability and order in Syria for the long-term and fundamental interest of the Syrian people.

From the above, one could easily miss the fact that China is dependent on Iranian oil.

Chaos in Syria is probably going to threaten that supply. Violent disorder certainly in the region will not provide the stability necessary for regionally expanding China's Belt and Road initiative.

So yes, spokesperson Mao, we other humans wish the Syrian peoples the best, as well

However, Zionists, as well as the West's neocon terrorists, have a way of ignoring what 'should be' and (instead) favor indulging in widely spread pillaging and the imposition of swaths of mass death.

Thus, I doubt that Neocons and Zionists are going to be listening to China's schoolmarmish advice.

In the same arguably ineffectual vein, Russia announced that it was going to take up the Syrian matter (where it has, or had, an expensive military presence) at the United Nations:

The UN Security Council is united in the need to “preserve the territorial integrity of Syria," Russian Permanent Representative to the UN Vassily Nebenzia said after a a closed-door meeting on Monday.

“We were talking about the need to work out a document by the Council […] in the coming days," Nebenzia said.

Sure, Ambassador, a document will certainly put a stop to the West's attacks on everything that lives:

Exactly like the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant for Netanyahu worked.

Or, equally inanely, precisely how the United Nations' announcement (that Israel was genociding in Gaza) stopped that maniacal practice.

All told

One wonders which disengaged and perceptibly unrealistic multiverse these Chinese, Russian and Iranian leadership folks are living in.

The long term view — that they all share — can be so long term, that it unwisely ignores the threats likely to sink it, before it comes to fruition.

Letting a visible invasion of rampant bugs eat one's plums before they ripen is (usually) a bad idea.

Recall, here, that the West is still lobbing missiles into Russia — surrounding China with hostile bases and water-based float-bys — and assassinating Iranian leaders at every opportunity.

Face, I think, matters in warring and near-warring situations.

Losing significant face (fairly perceived or not) — as Russia, China and Iran have unfortunately and perhaps unfairly done — throughout this most recent era of Israeli-sponsored genocide and land-stealing — matters strategically, with regard to perceived strength, smarts and oppositional determination.

Weakness, real or not, invites escalating attacks from the vicious morons, who run the United States and Israel.

Inviting nuke-armed nations' attacks is not, generally, a notably successful survival strategy, when facing legitimately powerful (if morally imbecilic) aggressors like the United States.

The moral? — The United States lit this global fire on purpose and rabidly keeps fueling it

Sadly, no notably competent 'first responders' are anywhere in sight.

Vicious stupidity and complacent pusillanimity appear to rule humanity.

Pertinently, if push comes to shove, most people probably would rather ride the mad dog's back, than slink around with an apparently scraggly-brained — don't wanna do nothing — cat or two.

That's the risk that Russia, China and Iran undertake in a long-term survival game that underestimates the manically applied viciousness launched by the 'retarded' nations that attack them.

Historically speaking, appeals to rationality tend to lose more often than they win.

PeteFree.com

Russian delusion, Chinese lecturing, and Iranian cluelessness — all on Syrian display