Pfizer's CEO happily chortled that — we will likely all become prisoners of annual COVID-19 vaccine boosters — think of the profits!

16 April 2021

Introduction

The sarcasm that follows is based upon two factors:

First, SARS-CoV-2 more likely than not came from combined Chinese-American "gain of function" meddling that was conducted in the equivalent of a bioweapons lab.

Second, despite incessant propaganda, COVID-19 poses a comparatively low threat to the majority of the world's healthy folk.

What is legitimately scary is that it is currently impossible to predict who, among apparently healthy people, actually is vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2's depredations.

Thus, the public health question remains:

Is turning the planet upside down and imprisoning most of us a reasonable cost-benefit response to COVID-19's real (not hyped) effects?

Especially so, when inexpensive and reasonably effective prophylactic and early treatment generic drugs are available and deliberately shunted aside by much of the developed world.

The predictable has happened, all by itself, again

Fancy that.

Pfizer's chief executive officer, Albert Bourla, 'supposed' that:

“A likely scenario is that there will be likely a need for a third dose, somewhere between six and 12 months and then from there, there will be an annual revaccination, but all of that needs to be confirmed. And again, the variants will play a key role,” he told CNBC’s Bertha Coombs during an event with CVS Health.

“It is extremely important to suppress the pool of people that can be susceptible to the virus,” Bourla said.

The comment comes after Johnson & Johnson CEO Alex Gorsky told CNBC in February that people may need to get vaccinated against Covid-19 annually, just like seasonal flu shots.

Of course

Johnson & Johnson's COVID vaccine is 'randomly' killing off a very-very low number of women by introducing their brains to blood clots.

Oxford-AstraZeneca's COVID vaccine is also reportedly exhibiting a clotting hazard of very-very low incidence.

And nobody knows what Pfizer and Moderna's mRNA vaccines hold — with regard to providing actual protection, lack of virus transmission, as well as associated long-term health 'curiosities' (if any) — across the foggy future.

I suppose that

We will have to integrate these understandably worrying statistical niggles into a (a probably propagandized) reassessment of what is worse — COVID vaccines or COVID.

With (again predictably) Government favoring COVID-19, not the vaccines, as constituting the Prime Godzilla to be guarded against.

Zero COVID seems to be Authority's mantra.

Since zero-ness has never been achieved for any mutating virus that I can recall, I suspect that the Zero COVID Mandate was originated for some other (probably nefarious) reason.

From Global Capitalism's perspective

'We' cannot allow the world public's suspicion of Authority interfere with the flow of corporate profits that Bribed Government exists to feed.

The moral? — Personal well-being will depend almost exclusively upon . . .

. . . individually cultivated abilities to detect, penetrate and dismember propaganda.

Happy times, indeed.

Give Government and Global Corporatism a hug today.

They will keep you warm for the hierarchically organized blood-sucking to follow.

PeteFree.com

Pfizer's CEO happily chortled that — we will likely all become prisoners of annual COVID-19 vaccine boosters — think of the profits!