American COVID's vaccine rats will scurry for cover — a new study

© 2022 Peter Free

 

24 June 2022

 

 

Caveat

 

This is another intelligence-requiring post for bright and attentive people.

 

Rather than indulge in tedious explanations regarding the below-cited COVID-19 vaccinations study, I will leave it to the following links to guide your thinking about what did (and did not) happen in the United States public health arena.

 

 

By way of introduction

 

A couple of weeks ago, I pointed y'all to biologist Brett Weinstein's thoughtful overview regarding the science-denying — and not coincidentally, Big Pharma-profiteering— mess that completely defines American public health:

 

 

UnHerd, Bret Weinstein: I will be vindicated over Covid, YouTube (06 June 2022) (48:03 minutes in length)

 

 

Today, we will briefly take up a subsequent study . . .

 

. . . which lends credence to Weinstein's forecast that his skepticism regarding the United States' COVID-19 response will eventually be vindicated:

 

 

Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively.

 

Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9).

 

The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).

 

The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.

 

© 2022 Joseph Fraiman, Juan Erviti, Mark Jones, Sander Greenland, Patrick Whelan, Robert M. Kaplan and Peter Doshi, Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials, SSRN (23 June 2022) (preprint) (at Abstract)

 

 

Reading between the above study's lines . . .

 

. . . we see that Big Pharma and American public health made it difficult to impossible to track COVID vaccinations' positive and negative outcomes.

 

Robert Malone (an mRNA vaccine inventor) explains how those methodological flaws (intentionally on purpose) happened.

 

He concludes that:

 

 

The decisions at that time were rushed, the usefulness of the two studies destroyed (intentionally?) by stopping the studies prematurely and then vaccinating the control group, and what data were gathered have been largely hidden from those who wish to do independent analyses.

 

The authors of the current analysis re-do attempt have done their best. But, as Dr. Doshi and colleagues have repeatedly requested, the proper analysis cannot be performed unless the original data sets are released.

 

Robert W. Malone, Pfizer and Moderna Analysis Re-do — Peter Doshi and colleagues' heroic attempt at re-analysis of the Phase 3 trials, rwmalonemd.substack.com (22 June 2022)

 

 

If you look Malone up on Wikipedia, ignore Wikipedia's "misinformation" claim about him.

 

Wikipedia is run by the American corporate establishment.

 

Though often useful regarding topics that fall within the Establishment's non-interests, where those interests are concerned — Wikipedia amounts to truth-suppressing, full-blown propaganda.

 

 

Vaccinating the control group — proves bad intent

 

If you vaccinate nearly everyone in an efficacy-safety study — and subsequently, most of the national population — you have completely removed the 'normal' baseline.

 

Bad effects, which would have been attributable to the intervention, will disappear.

 

We all know this.

 

That American public health allowed Big Pharma to get away with this methodologically-based concealment is mind-boggling.

 

Yet, that deception perfectly fits the US pattern in which not one randomized controlled trial took plae, regarding any of our supposed COVID interventions. Masks, lockdowns, 6-foot spacing and so on.

 

Keep in mind, it has been 2.5 years since the supposed pandemic began.

 

Don't try to tell me that this lack of scientific investigation was an oversight.

 

 

The moral? — They're all rats

 

As Brett Weinstein said in his interview with Freddie Sayers, sensible people would not leave the past and current COVID-control crew in charge of anything, including a purported investigation of themselves.