Jim Hightower Admirably Explained How Plutocrats and Judges Pickpocket Our Wallets
© 2015 Peter Free
26 February 2015
Would anarchy be preferable to the corrupt system that we have now?
Maybe — at least we might get a few licks of our own in under a system that is not designed to suck our lives away (pun intended):
America's laws to deter corporate crime actually force victims to help subsidize the criminals.
First, a court orders a corporation to pay punitive damages to a victim of its criminal acts;
second, the corporate offender pays up, then merrily subtracts a big chunk of that payment from its income tax, effectively taking money out of our public treasury;
third, while the criminal is counting its tax break, the victim is notified that the punitive damage money he or she received from the corporation will be taxed as "regular income;"
fourth, that means a big chunk of the victim's payment effectively goes to replenish the public money the corporate villain subtracted.
Bad enough that corporate-financed lawmakers legalize such encouragement of criminality, but corporate-coddling judges are playing the same disgraceful game by drastically reducing the amounts that juries order corporations to pay.
© 2015 Jim Hightower, Corporate crime supported by a whirligig of legal favoritism, JimHightower.com (25 February 2015) (reformatted extracts)
The moral? — Terrorists are going after the wrong people
Maybe we just need to change the definition of infidel.
Think of this as an exercise in creating a more legitimate civics from scratch — where civics is defined as:
the study or science of the privileges and obligations of citizens.
© 2015 Random House, Civics, Dictionary.com (visited 26 February 2015)